I have stumbled across this club. Is it a legitimate club. Can you show puppies that are registered with this club and are they all pedigree dogs?
Thanks
I believe you could cross a lizard with a cow and register the offspring. Sorry. This is just a pet registery. They will accept ANY cross and give it a fancy name.
Ditto. It's basically a puppy mill registry.
AKC is also a puppy mill registry.
AKC is the only official registry for Labradors. Continental Kennel Club was established for puppy mills to be able to "register" dogs and puppies in order to be able to sell them with "papers". There is no track of parentage, and they register anything, as soon as you pay the fee. Most people don't know a thing about it, and they are just happy to get a puppy with "papers".
CKC are worth nothing. Not to be confused with Canadian Kennel Club.
If you got a puppy with CKC papers, sorry.
If you are considering buy a puppy with CKC papers, run from it.....
Continental KC is just as good as UKC.
Pretty much worthless!!
We could go round and round about what constitutes a puppy mill. The term puppy mill in itself is a term coined by the AR people. They think EVERYONE who breeds dogs and turns out puppies is a puppy mill. So please STOP with throwing that term around! We are fighting a uphill battle when we divide ourselves and think we are elitist among the dog fancy and are therefore untouchable when it comes to antibreeding legislation. WE ARE NOT and whether we like to see puppies breed in high volume, sold through petstores, etc as long as there is a market, someone will be cashing in. I know of quite a few "show" breeders who also breed in volume too. Is that wrong too? If we keep dividing ourselves into what *WE* think is right and wrong, we will be so few that we can't possibly stand up to the pending antibreeding laws. There are plenty of laws on the books now that protect these dogs and if they were enforced, then there is no need to present more. And it doesn't matter whether you have 2 dogs or 200 dogs. If you don't take care of them properly, you are breaking the law.
Now with that said, The Continental Kennel Club (ConKC) not CKC as those initials belong to the respected Candian Kennel Club, was established as a place for "high volume" breeders to go to to continue registering their dogs once they were suspended from AKC. These breeders were inspected by AKC and found not in compliance with AKC's record and indentification policies. Some may have been suspended for falsifying records or others because their dogs were kept in unclean conditions. But for whatever reasons these high volume breeders, knowing papers bring a higher price for puppies, formed their own registry to get away from all that "strictness" at AKC. To make more money, they opened their registry up to just about anything. It also didn't matter if your dog was AKC registered with a co-owner, you could get your dog free and clear through ConKC.
So it just comes down to whether or not it is a reputable club. My opinion is NO!
Dianne Mullikin, EMT-B
Los Angeles, CA
GO LAKERS!!!
So would you be able to register puppies without showing a proper export certificate? I appreciate all of your comments. It has been very helpful. We had a feeling this is what the club was about but needed verification.
JMO:
Things that makes a puppy mill:
Not AKC. (At least for Labs. I understand non AKC breeds go through UKC or other clubs) Everybody is AKC until they get kicked out, for whatever reason.
No health clearance as established by CHIC.
Animals kept in good conditions. Clean, well fed, Healthy, etc.
Puppies sold mostly through pet shops.
This is what I fight, and want to see them disappear.
Things that make a Show Mill:
High volume breeding. How much is too much? when you don't have the time to work, play and hug your dogs often. How much is often? I would say daily.
I don't condemn show mills. I personally feel bad for the dogs, because they don't get any of the advantages of been a little bit of a pet, like family love, socializacion, etc, but I would not have a problem getting a puppy from them. I know I'm getting a high quality puppy.
No, it's sad to be as disrespectful as YOU are. I didn't call you any names, but you stooped to calling me dumb. Real grown up of you.
UKC can claim to be as big as they want and as old as they want. The truth is the majority of the dogs they register and that show up at their little shows are pets or should be, and they can't hold a candle to AKC as far as quality.
I bet Cont. KC is an even BIGGER registry if you just want to count numbers!! LOL
I did not accuse you of calling me dumb. That was another poster, whom I quoted.
But you saying "Just as an AKC champion can be as good as the handler showing it! UKC is a great alternative to the sometime expensive and snobbish world of AKC" is just as narrow minded and offensive as what I did say about UKC.
I don't have any concerns about what UKC says or does. I was stating an opinion and I did not resort to name calling like the other poster who called me dumb.
I just stated that IMO, UKC and Cont. KC are worthless registries, regardless of how many people use them. Numbers don't make quality, and the same goes for AKC. They fact is, UKC & Cont. KC are alternative registries to the AKC and they are used frequently by people who either are suspended by AKC (as someone else pointed out) or who can't breed on their AKC registration. I will add that their events are poorly run and low quality as well, when compared to AKC.
To your comment about handlers, sometimes that is true yes, but isn't that a part of any real competative venue?
UKC makes me think of those days when I was a kid and you went to a "game" of some sort and since you were a child, no one won and everyone got a prize
Actually, I have volunteered many times for AKC shows and hunt tests. I enjoy it very much!
I have never, nor will I ever enter or volunteer at a UKC show however. I have been to a few to watch just because they were in the area and I wanted to check it out.
I won't bother again.
So my opinion has been formed by actually seeing, and yes, it was recently.
It is unfortunate that you feel the way you do about the UKC and their events. We show both AKC, and UKC,and have done well in both. To label the UKC shows as being attended by only pet quality dogs is rather simple minded of you, but you are entitled to your opinion,as we all are. We have both UKC and AKC champions. Do you see pet quality dogs at UKC shows? Sure, but you also see them at AKC shows as well. We love UKC shows because it gives us a place to bring the young ones out for experience. You can decide at the last minute to go, and still be able to register. There are 2 shows a day which allows us to socialize with the many wonderful Labrador friends we have made. At AKC shows, we show and then everyone seems to go on their merry way. Since there are 2 shows a day in UKC, people tend to hang around, and it is generally a very nice time. If you choose not to attend UKC shows that's fine. However, don't consider that they have no worth. We are thankful to have a place to get our pups(as well as older ones needing more experience)out in a show setting that is less stressful!!!
I agree Laurie, I have AKC champion and pointed dogs who are also UKC champions and grands. The UKC is the perfect venue to get a new young puppy warmed up to the shows. It also is a fantastic venue to practice your own handling skills. You cannot get this kind of practice or this type of experience for yourself or your dog in any handling class. To each their own.
So if a breeder who is registered with the AKC registers a litter they are ashamed of with Continental KC is there any disciplinary action forthcoming from the AKC?
I can't remember now, but there are some breeds that choose to have their registry with UKC while getting the approval from AKC, and AKC accepted UKC registered dogs for that particular breed. Once they became AKC, UKC was not accepted any more. Toy fox terriers maybe?
"No none whatsoever but if any of those puppies were ever bred they could never be registered with the AKC after being register soley with the ConKC. AKC does not recognize ConKC nor does it recognize another other American Registries."
Actually, this is no longer true. The AKC is now registering dogs from any other registry as long as you can prove "an unbroken line of AKC registered dogs within 3 generations". This means that as long as ALL of the great-grandparents are AKC registered, they will register your dog. They will issue a registration of the same type as your dog has with the other registry. So, if you have full UKC, AKA, Contintal KC registration, they will issue a full AKC registration. Let me find the specific and links for you guys and I will post it later.
No that's not true
Akc will only register if the breeder registers the litter
Unless you are talking about an ILP and that's not a real registration it is only done so you can enter say, obedience.
T
Akc certainly does not honor any other but foreign registries
Wrong again. You conveniently quoted only information that supported your claim.
The real story is that AKC is NOT accepting "other registries" as proof of AKC eligibility.
And they are not just registering UKC or Cont KC or any of those registries without verified AKC parentage.
Below quote taken directly from Dog News article written by by AKC
http://www.dognews.com/2008/60608/akcfaq.html
"2. Will AKC accept any dog from any registry?
No. AKC is not accepting dogs from other registries, but researching AKC registration eligibility. In order to determine AKC registration eligibility, the dog owner will be required to provide a pedigree for the dog in question. The dog may qualify for registration if the pedigree shows no break in AKC lineage and 100% of the dogs in the pedigree originate from AKC registrable stock.
In order to maintain the integrity of the registry, any dog registered under this initiative is required to have permanent identification.
A dog registered with an alternate registry will not be deemed AKC registrable without thorough AKC pedigree research. AKC staff is confident that the integrity of the AKC registry will not be compromised.
4. Will AKC accept parentage documentation
from other organizations for research purposes?
Registration through the Administrative Research Registration does not imply registration reciprocity between AKC and alternative registries. AKC does not accept paperwork from competing registries at face value. Staff will continue its detailed research process and will only grant registration to those dogs who show no break in AKC lineage and whose lineage originates from AKC registrable stock. Any dog registered through the service must adhere to the Rules Applying to Registration and Discipline."
Read it how you will, but I have a copy of a full AKC registration issued to a dog who was sired by an AKC registered dog, but out of a dam who was registered with an alternative registry. However, I am not at liberty to share that photocopy with the general public.
"The dog may qualify for registration if the pedigree shows no break in AKC lineage and 100% of the dogs in the pedigree originate from AKC registrable stock.
In order to maintain the integrity of the registry, any dog registered under this initiative is required to have permanent identification.
A dog registered with an alternate registry will not be deemed AKC registrable without thorough AKC pedigree research."
Notice it says 100% of the dogs have to originate from AKC registered dogs. It does not say that they have to be AKC registered dogs. You should also be able to reason that dogs registered with alternative registries WILL be accepted if their pedigree can be verified by the AKC. It says so right in what you quoted.
I think you just don't want to acknowledge that the AKC, in their effort to boost profits, is making rule changes that damage their integrity. 1st it is the Conditional registrations (dogs whose parentage can't be proven), then the ability to change registered names, then the Administrative Research Registrations and this fall, they will be registering mixed breeds. Hmmm...
I will contact the AKC on Monday and get the current details on the Administrative Research Registration Policies. Then I would be happy to share them with this list.
One must understand the contentious relationship between the two oldest and largest registries in the U.S. in order to grasp the significance. The competitiveness became outright animosity when Wayne Cavanaugh left his position as an AKC V.P. and went on to become the owner of the United Kennel Club.
We have a con artist that has moved to NZ. They breed under the names of Silversky Labradors. They have stolen a bitch from another breeder and it went to court. They were allowed to keep the bitch but the papers were endorsed "not to be bred from lifetime and not eligible for export cert" He has bred he (twice now) and registered the pups with the CKC even though he lives in NZ. Their names are Trevor and Tracey Hindle and they breed "Silvers". We have had an ongoing battle for 4 years about these con-artists.