Somewhere there is an article supporting not removing dews. Reasons being that removing them weakens the ligament that supported it thereby weakening the pastern. If dogs are going to be worked often in rough terrain then maybe they should have their dews removed to prevent tearing it. Or - if the dews stick out on the side of the leg and are unsightly then remove them. My dogs carry their dews very close to their leg - not unsightly at all - and they use them for a number of activities.
Read the url I posted. Example after example of dogs injured by torn dew claws, posted by people who saw the injury first-hand.
My dogs do obedience, some at CDX level, and field and the youngest that had the dew claws removed lived to be over 14 with no unsoundness in front. If agility dogs are having problems, I would guess that jumping them on hard surfaces has a lot more to do with it than presence or absence of dew claws. I train outdoors on grass.
I can't figure out how coyotes, wolves, and foxes survive without humans to remove the dewclaws from their whelps if it is such an issue in the field. IMO, breed for nice tight feet, including dews held close to the leg.
I can't figure out how coyotes, wolves, and foxes survive without humans to remove the dewclaws from their whelps if it is such an issue in the field. IMO, breed for nice tight feet, including dews held close to the leg.
