Labrador Retriever Forum
I do believe he said "private emails". How is that advertising?
JERK(S)
What is wrong with you people? why do you have to be so critical?
To Couldn't Resist,
Michael knows the rules and didn't break them. He happens to be a board moderator-adminstrator for Jill.
Gawd lighten up people it was a joke. I am sure he knows the rules and that is why I "couldn't resist".
I love how you are so quick to rush to Michael's defense the same as you all did for Jill's issue, but when it comes to others you are all quick to jump on the bash bandwagon. And Gail, even going so far as to call me a jerk for just messing around? Thanks for proving my point you all can't take a joke and rush to Michael and Jill like they are gods are something. Get a life or at least a sense of humor.
I love how you are so quick to rush to Michael's defense the same as you all did for Jill's issue, but when it comes to others you are all quick to jump on the bash bandwagon. And Gail, even going so far as to call me a jerk for just messing around? Thanks for proving my point you all can't take a joke and rush to Michael and Jill like they are gods are something. Get a life or at least a sense of humor.
The phat photographer. Not meaning
pretty hot and tempting. You brought up
private business a lady doesn't & gave
yourself away. Go away & leave your hosts
be mala chica.
I couldn't agree more with couldn't resist. It's called sarcastic humor. He/she was just trying to be funny by reposting what 99% of the rest of the forum would have done to someone else. He/she also pointed out that others have been bashed on here and nothing was the done for days. I've seen it too. Whether a certain someone uses a handler to finish dogs or a certain someone has too many dogs or a certain-well you get the gist of it. I'm sorry when Jill had her incident but many commented negatively on it, not just one. That was wrong too. That is why the Forum was on lockdown. I'm not trying to stir up trouble just merely pointing as couldn't resist did, that there is a double standard here. There are always those with personal vendetta who jump at any chance to express that. They care not about who they hurt. Names like jerk, or calling someone phat (which in that context means hot) but we really know he/she was calling some fat is downright mean. I don't know who he/she is referring to and frankly don't want to know. That was just plain mean whoever he/she was referring to. No one is perfect. Not every written word is taken in the context for which it was written. So please take this as the joke for which couldn't resist says it was intended instead of reading too much into it. The Potomac is just around the corner-let's party.
